Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Scott McGrath
10/11/17
Current Event 4


In this article, the author describes how a genealogy researcher by the name of Christina Scates helped solve a homicide that was previously ruled unsolved. Scates, a biology major at Cleveland University, who stumbled upon the grave of a set of unknown bones. She later found out that the case was closed after no avail in locating a killer, and decided to take matters into her own hands. She received the case file from a compliant officer in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where she learned that on February 5th 1975 a skeleton had been found by some teens strolling through a park. The coroner deemed the death a homicide, and the the hunt for the killer began. The killer, nor the identity of the victim, was ever discovered. The body was buried in an unmarked grave. Scates posted the information of the file in a reddit forum, a forum which had already been successful in discovering the identity of a man killed in  a car crash 20 years earlier. The case began to draw attention, where a forensic artist eventually drew up a sketch based on details found from the crime scene, such as hair in the mud, etc. This forensic artist used programs to recreate the face of the victim based on bone readings, and eventually got a call from the same officer who gave the files to Scates. They learned that the bones had never been submitted into a database for missing persons, due to a typo. With the correction made, a name and photograph appeared to them, looking awfully like the drawing made by the forensic artist. The body was discovered to be that of Linda Pagano, a girl gone missing 6 months before the skeleton was found. She fit the missing person's file, and was ruled to be the skeleton. With The help of Reddit, the family of Linda Pagano was able to receive some sort of closure, even though a killer or real cause of death has yet to be determined.

This article is very significant in the world of Forensic science. It goes to show that a group of people dedicated to a task, can sometimes complete this task through hard work, even when the odds are stacked against you. A group of reddit users was able to discover the identity of a skeleton found in 1975, through some good detective work and determination. They located errors that made the case insolvable, and corrected them, something the police had not been able to do. With a case like this being solved by a few curious minds on the internet, who's to say what will be solved next.

I think that this article was well written, but became confusing at times. The information was thrown at the reader all at once, and was hard to take in all at once at times.The author did a good job at emphasizing the fact that this case was solved by someone who stumbled upon it on reddit, making sure that that aspect of it was not overlooked. Overall, this case interested me very much, seeing as I had not heard of anything of the sorts before, and was a generally well written article.

1 comment:

  1. Skylar Lau
    9/12/21
    Current Event Comment 1

    https://www.ohio.com/akron/news/local/curious-internet-users-may-have-solved-akrons-oldest-active-missing-persons-case
    https://bhscorechem.blogspot.com/2017/10/scott-mcgrath-101117-current-event-4.html

    In this review, the author Scott McGrath reviews an article about how a genealogy researcher helped solve a previously ruled unsolved homicide case. First of all, the author describes the article very well. In a short paragraph, the author explains the article and does not leave me with any questions. Also, the author has many good critiques. McGrath says that the article often left him confused and was hard to read. Finally, the author relates the article to life and humanity. McGrath states that the article shows how normal people on the internet can help solve crimes.

    This review was overall well written, but there are still some problems. For example, the author does not give many examples in his reasoning. When talks about the flaws of the original article he does not give quotes or evidence. Also, the review is pretty short. Most of the review is taken up by the summary of the article and not the review of the article with the review being less than half of the total review.

    This article and review taught me a lot, but one thing I learned was the power of the internet. A group of people on Reddit were able to help solve a murder case from 1975. The group only had a little help from professionals and officials. This shows how powerful the internet and people are.





    ReplyDelete