Wednesday, December 9, 2009

"Boom! Hok! A Monkey Language Is Deciphered"

This article is about the Campbell's Monkey, a fellow primate that lives in the forests of the Tai National Park in Ivory Coast, they have developed a language that can now be deciphered. The adult males have six types of call, each with a specific meaning, but they can string two or more calls together into a message with a different meaning. A group led by Klaus Zuberbuhler of the University of St. Andrews in Scotland have spent moths recording the monkeys' calls in response to both natural and artificial stimuli. This group argues that the Campbell's monkeys have a primate form of syntax. This statement is likely to be a controversial claim because despite extensive efforts to teach chimpanzees language, the subjects showed little or no ability to combine the sounds they learned into a sentence with a larger meaning. Still, species like gibbons and whaled make complex vocalizations in which the order of the sound seems to have some effect on their meaning. The team still have reports of deciphering some of the Campbell's monkey's communications. For example, "Krak" is a call that warns of leopards in the vicinity. The monkey's gave it in response to real leopards and to model leopards or leopard growls broadcasted by the researchers. The monkeys can vary the call by adding the suffix "-oo:"krak-oo" seems to be a general work for predator. The "boom-boom" call invites other monkeys to come toward the male making the sound. Two booms can be combined with a series of "krak-oos," with a meaning entirely different to that of wither of its components. "Boom boom krak-oo krak-oo krak-oo" is the monkey's version of "Timber!" or a warning of falling trees. The meaning of monkey calls was first worked out with vervet monkeys. which have distinct alarm calls for each of their three main predators, the martial eagle, leopards, and snakes, but the vervets did not combine their alarm calls to generate new meanings. If the Zuberbühler team’s observations are correct, the Campbell’s monkeys can both vary the meaning of specific calls by adding suffixes and combine calls to generate a different meaning. Their call system, the researchers write, “may be the most complex example of ‘proto-syntax’ in animal communication known to date.” Dr. Zuberbühler said he planned to play back recordings of given calls to the Campbell’s monkeys and to test from their reactions whether he had correctly decoded their messaging system. I thought this article was very interesting. I think that we could learn a lot from monkeys because they are the most human-like creature. It would be a great discovery if they are right about what they have deciphered. I also think many other kinds of monkeys have speech like these ones, but we just haven't discovered it yet. I would like to learn more about what happens next, if they decipher more or if they find more mokey's in which have a language too.

3 comments:

  1. Clare presented this article very well. First off she gave a clear summary of the importance of this article, by introducing the title of the article. This title gave us what the article would be telling us, that a monkey language was decipherable. Also she used many examples within explaining the language that can be deciphered. Such as the meaning to the call out "boom boom krak-oo-krak-oo", timber. She also says how deciphering this language helps human kind considering they are the most human like animal. I wish clare would've spoken louder in her presenting in class. Also i wish she could explain the science testing part of this article. This presentation and article was very interesting for me because i did a study on monkey progressions in eye color earlier this year so to hear this is interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Clare’s review was very interesting to read and it made me want to read the article. She had a lot of great details in her article including some of the words which the monkeys say. Lastly, she presented her article in class in a way which was clear and easy to understand.
    I would have wanted to know if there were any other studies like this one that were done on other types of monkeys. Also, I think that her review would have been easier to follow if she broke it up into paragraphs.
    From this review I learned that monkeys have there own language and it might be very similar to our own.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In Clare’s presentation, she did many things well. Instead of including useless details, she clearly stated the point of her article and made a very strong impression on her audience. Secondly, Clare picked a very good article; this topic is interesting to many people, including me. I enjoyed reading this review very much. Lastly, this was a good length. It was not too short yet not too long. There are a few things that could have been done a little better. First, she maybe did not need as many details included in her review. Secondly, she could have stated who held the tests on monkeys and where they were from. Although this is stated in her review, it would have been more specific in her presentation. I am very impressed with how far communication has come and that we have the ability to understand monkeys!

    ReplyDelete