This article is important because it shows that sometimes the diseases, like Alzheimer’s, is cause not by foreign invaders or viruses, but by proteins that our body creates to protect the brain from infections. This is important because Alzheimer’s is a very serious disease in which people start to forget everything from their lives, and makes them have a harder life since they do not remember important information. A cure to Alzheimer’s can save many lives and help the elderly by allowing them to remember information that they need in their lives. The discovery of A-beta and how it is part of the innate immune system tells scientists what to take as the next step, which is to control the brain on the production of this protein. Many people can be saved from getting Alzheimer’s and can lead normal lives when they are elderly.
The article states well on why A-beta and other proteins in the brain are important to figuring out why Alzheimer’s is caused in the brain. Also, the article explains well on how A-beta is very similar to other proteins and how it might cause Alzheimer’s. The article could have expanded more on how the nerves were broken after the plaque builds up on it, and also explain on why only removing the plaque will not cure the disease. This article is very important by trying to piece together the mystery on why Alzheimer’s is cause and how it should be treated. Hopefully in the near future more data is being discovered and Alzheimer’s will be completely cured.
Kolata, Gina. “Infection Defense May Spur Alzheimer’s.” New York Times 8 Mar. 2010: n. pag. Web. 8 Mar. 2010.
Juliana did many things well in this article. First of all, she explained the possible cause of Alzheimer’s and other scientific information thoroughly, but still kept the language and structure very concise when describing the processes of the brain, antibodies, etc. Also, she did an excellent job of paraphrasing the actual steps of the experiment Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi conducted, describing such things as his hypothesis and the evidence he points to for proof very well. Lastly, I think the article she picked was perfect for reviewing, as it was long and detailed, contained quotes of scientists, and came from a quality source in The New York Times.
ReplyDeleteThough this review was terrific, there are some things that can be improved. First of all, some terms, such as A-beta, could’ve been defined better, as their nature was somewhat vague. Also, as a writer I would try and make the sentences less choppy and more flowing to keep the reader interested and engaged.
Before reading this review and article, I did not realize such advancements in medicine regarding widespread diseases, like Alzheimer’s, were succeeding, or at least were being heavily hypothesized on. However, this article gave me hope, and struck home for some who have experienced this terrible disease.