Campbell, Thomas A., Skylar Tibbits, and Banning Garrett. "The Programmable World." Scientific American Nov. 2014: 61-65. Web.
The
Programmable World is written by several scientists who
have been working on solving problems with devices that assemble themselves or
can change shape or use automatically or remotely. Skylar Tibbits, a research scientist
at MIT, has been trying to build machines without the conventional tools: wires,
motors or electronics. His devices are printed as flat rectangles, but change shape
when they touch water. These types of objects are referred to as being “4-D
printed” because after they are printed in three dimensions, they change over
time (the fourth dimension). Christopher Williams, a scientist at Virginia
Tech, has figured out a way to print circuits onto 4-D objects. These can be
used to send a signal that changes the shape of the object. He envisions this
idea eventually being used in anything from robots that fix themselves to self-assembling
buildings! Thomas Campbell, also from Virginia Tech, has figured out a way to
insert nanomaterials (materials which have properties that affect things on a
small scale) and objects into 3-D printed designs. Once attached, the nanomaterials
can then be used to change the shape or use of the object.
4-D printing is
interesting to me because it could really change my everyday life. For
instance, airplane wings that change shape with different weather conditions
would make planes safer. If someone loses their keys, they can print more. Right
now the authors can do things like print 4-D models of their schools’ logos,
but things like machines that repair themselves are not yet ready. Also,
programmable objects could also be hacked and taken over by people who want to
be destructive. This means that while 4-D printing could be very useful, it
could bring a new set of problems as well. Whether mainly good or bad, 4-D
printing will change the world I grow up in and I am excited to see what
develops.
The authors talk about
many possible uses of 4-D printing. They do not explain, however, why shape
changing plastics are better than, say, a robot that uses motors and
electricity to self-assemble. In other words, they do not look at the cons:
plastics are weak materials that have low melting points.
No comments:
Post a Comment