Wednesday, October 15, 2014

The Head-Scratching Case of the Vanishing Bees


  NY Times Article and Video         

I read and reviewed an article called “The Head-Scratching Case of the Vanishing Bees” written by a New York Times author named Clyde Haberman.  The article was about the struggles bee keepers have to maintain many healthy colonies of bees.  The bees are dying or leaving the colony due to unknown reasons.  One bee keeper lost 400 colonies in just one day. Across the country bee keepers are losing up to ninety percent of their colonies. The problem is not the queen, but the worker bees that just leave. Over the last two years over 600,000 colonies have been lost or died out.  Also, in the winter, when the bees normally louse five to ten percent of the population, bees have been losing up to thirty percent. In the US people call the problem the Colony Collapse Disorder, while in Britain it is called the Mary Celeste Syndrome. The cause for the bees’ deaths is still undetermined. However, there are many theories. Some say that it is cellphone towers or genetically modified crops. Most, however, blame pesticides. Neonicotinoids or neonics for short is one pesticide most commonly blamed. It is a systemic chemical that goes from the plants base to its flowers. When bees are affected by it, it can cloud their brain and they might forget where home is. The chemical was banned in Europe for the same reason, but France who had already banned it did not see better results with the bees. Other theories include a parasite called Varroa Destructor which can damage a bee’s immune system. An expert, Jeffery S. Pettis, said that Varroa Destructor is a bee plague. A final Theory is that the bees are too tired and stressed from their shipment across the country.

           
This article is very important because it show the problem with the bees. The bees might be a small worry but they help to pollinate a ton of our food. They pollinate apples, blueberries, avocados, soybeans, strawberries and more. According to the US department of Agriculture one third of the food we eat depends on bee pollination. Besides that, there are billions of dollars tied up in to the business which sell and produce the food, every year. Without the bees we would not have many foods that are plants. The bees help to keep business afloat and without them the economy will suffer.  

 
The article was written very well. The article had a nice flow to it and all of the authors thoughts were organized in to neat paragraphs.  The article also had good sentences, which were written in a way that is easy to understand. The author included many facts that were helpful. To improve the article the author could have included more quotes. Overall the author did a good job and helped to keep me informed.

3 comments:

  1. Drew Judkins

    Three things I liked about the review of the article were one, Spencer gave many of the theories of why the bees are leaving and having a lower population that I thought was a good aspect. Another thing Spencer did very well with was explaining why people should care about the bees because they pollinate one third of the food we eat. Spencer also gave statistics about the bee’s population decrease, which made it easier to say the drastic change in their population down fall. Two things I think he could have done better on are he could have added how it started around 2007 and is now very bad. Also he could have added why some people might not care about the bees. One thing I really like about the article was that it gave many facts about how the bee`s population is decreasing and about how to help save the bees.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Spencer’s review of The Head-Scratching Case of the Vanishing Bees was a very interesting review. First of all, since this subject was completely foreign to me, the way that Spencer explained what was happening to the bees before getting into the theories, helped me understand the theories much better. Furthermore, Spencer did a really good job on thoroughly explaining the different theories and what they meant. With direct facts from the articles, the theories seemed concrete and plausible. Finally, Spencer did a very good job explaining the consequences of the vanishing bees. The way he tied everything back to our lives, helped me really understand the consequences.
    Although this review was well written, one way it could have been made better is that Spencer could have elaborated a bit more on the last paragraph, it seemed a rushed. In addition, in the last paragraph, almost every sentence started with “The article…” and was very short. So, if Spencer had tied his sentences together and added a few more sentences, the paragraph would have had a nice flow to it.
    In conclusion, the article was very interesting and well written. By reading it I learned about a new problem in the United States, the dying bees. I had no idea that there were bees dying by an unknown source and was very interested by the review.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Spencer had lots of information on what is happening to the bees and how there is a low population. He also explained why we should care for them. Spencer gave a good explanation on that no one knows for sure why they just leave. It could have had more theories on why the bees left and how they plan on getting them back. Spencer should have had more information on why people think the bees left. I was surprised on how much of the population of bees are just leaving and no one knows why. I was impressed by how much information was given in such a short paragraph.

    ReplyDelete